For my take on media coverage of the crisis in Haiti, see here.
Filed under: Latin America, Media, Videos | 6 Comments
Tags: Charlie Brooker, Haiti, Media, Newswipe, Racism
Getting Voltaire wrong
According to Wikipedia Voltaire’s oft-cited defence of the right to free speech cannot in fact be attributed to him. Nor can this:
“I do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll certainly give you prominent platform from which to say it.”
Tim Marshall’s Foreign Matters blog at Sky News is a painfully forced attempt by an establishment journalist to immitate the 
stereotypical informal, sarky irreverence of amateur blogs. Embarassing “I’m down” blog-kitsch aside, Marshall seems to have adopted one blogging stereotype too many: a failure to conduct basic research and invest minimal thought in a post before hitting ‘publish’.
After receiving word of the CU Israel Society’s decision to cancel a planned talk by Israeli historian and anti-Arab racist Benny Morris following pressure from Cambridge students and faculty, Marshall was outraged. Knees jerking uncontrollably, he fumed:
“They’re at it again. Our future parliamentarians, jurists, and all round bankers are busy stifling free speech at one of our top Universities. Voltaire’s maxim is all but forgotten.
Hey look everybody: someone’s working themselves up into a totally unnecessary self-righteous froth over an imagined assault on “free speech”! Yaaay!
Firstly – and I apologise for spelling this out, but evidently some people have genuinely failed to grasp it – the right to “free speech” does not entail the right to a platform at the University of Cambridge to spout racist garbage. It certainly does not entail the right to invite an unabashed racist to speak at the University of Cambridge without provoking serious opposition from students who have to live with the consequences of an atmosphere poisoned by racism.
Secondly, as Tim Marshall knows, because he himself reports it, we didn’t cancel the Benny Morris talk (and nor did “Cambridge Uni … ban” anyone). The Israel Society did. As far as I can tell it did so not out of principle but because it didn’t want to be tainted by a public association with racism. There is no violation of “free speech” here, there is simply vigorous opposition to the invitation of an overt racist to speak on campus, and an apparently tactical decision by the Israel Society in light of that opposition to cancel the talk.
Marshall concedes that Morris has some “highly disagreeable views” (an interesting euphemism for racism), and that one can legitimately disagree with the IsraelSoc’s decision to invite him (which is exactly what we did), but this, he maintains, is all besides the point:
“A hate campaign against all things Israeli has infected the campuses of Britain and in turn is in danger of engendering a climate in which Voltaire’s maxim is changed to ‘I will defend to the death your right to say something as long as I agree with it’. The anti-Israel crowd frequently resorts to bullying tactics.”
Predictably Marshall adduces no evidence to support this non-sequitur, presumably because none exists.
Marshall criticises IsraelSoc’s decision for “placing the feelings of those who might be offended above the right of the speaker to be heard”. Again, he needs to re-read Voltaire (or, y’know, someone less clichéd). Benny Morris has no more “right … to be heard” from a platform at the University of Cambridge than he does to be heard from Wembley Stadium. If he wants to spread hatred against Palestinians and Arabs, presumably during his time off from warmongering against Iran in the New York Times or apologising for ethnic cleansing in Ha’aretz, let him bother his friends and relatives with it. Or let him, y’know, start a blog.
————–
For your amusement: a selection of other responses to the campaign, ranging from the stupid:
“Typical of the Islamic Left trying to silence free speech… but only when it suits them”
to the racist:
“Jamie SW, you are indeed the racist. Surely you must know that Islam is a universalist religion, and that Judaism isn’t. And perhaps you have even noticed the violence of the rhetoric, the tens of thousands of acts of violence, the overt wars of Muslim conquests going on before our eyes such as in Darfur, Nigeria, and other parts of the world, the mocking statements broadcast day in day out of how “we love death and Jews love life”. Yet you go out of your wits when someone mentions any of this. Why? I’ll tell you why. It’s because you hold Muslims to lesser standards, as if they were irresponsible children whom it is your moral duty, you the enlightened, to protect. Think about it”
to the downright bizarre:
“Islam is not a religion but an ideology no different than fascism or communism. The quran is a war manual of hate, denigrating women to second class citizens. It also makes paedophilia lawful. Thats why you lefties love it!!!!”
Not forgetting this charming little aperçu:
“Oswald Mosley would be so proud of you little nazis”
Filed under: Activism, Israeli / Palestinian, meta | 11 Comments
Tags: Benny Morris, Cambridge, Free Speech, Islamophobia, meta, Racism, Tim Marshall, university
Myself and a few others – including but not limited to the authors of the Democrat’s Diary, For Tomorrow and Convenient Lies - have just launched a new leftist political site, New Left Project, to provide a space for non-sectarian, progressive, internationalist political commentary. We’ll be publishing original articles as well as aggregating the best from the leftist blogosphere. We’ve opened with:
- an interview with Noam Chomsky on climate change, nuclear proliferation, Haiti and the financial crisis
- a piece by David Wearing dissecting the myths surrounding the debate on the British economy
- an in-depth interview with US historian and journalist Paul Street on Obama’s first year in office
Finally, I’ve written a piece comparing the discourse surrounding the humanitarian crises in Haiti and Gaza, focusing on the continuities rather than the differences:
“Haiti & Gaza: The Political Economy of Humanitarianism
In Gaza Palestinians are demonised to justify their violent repression and economic strangulation; in Haiti victims are portrayed as savages in order to justify the militarisation of aid at the expense of relief efforts (and, therefore, of untold numbers of Haitian lives)…”
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Media, US | 9 Comments
Tags: Gaza, Haiti, humanitarianism, New Left Project, Noam Chomsky, Racism
Related reading:
- Israeli Minister Yuri Edelstein cited the Holocaust to dismiss the Goldstone report:
“The connection between the Goldstone Report and the international Holocaust memorial day is not an easy thing. On the other hand, however, we must learn the lessons from what happened. Then too, those who yelled out were told that Hitler is a clown and that all the gloomy predictions of the 1930s were nonsense.
“On the Holocaust memorial day of all days, which also marks the battle against global anti-Semitism, we must discuss this connection, because today the soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces are accused of harvesting organs, murdering children and raping women…
“After World War II and the establishment of the State of Israel, anti-Semitism is not directed at Jews but at Israel and the Israelis. The Goldstone Report, the publications in Sweden about organ harvesting and similar reports, are simply a type of anti-Semitism.”
- Prime Minister Netanyahu used the occasion of Holocaust Memorial Day to agitate for a confrontation with Iran:
“We must warn of the impending danger to the rest of the world and at the same time to be ready to defend ourselves … The most important lesson from the Shoah is that murderous evil must be stopped as soon as possible, before it can realize its schemes.”
“We the Jewish people learned the lesson [of the Holocaust] well after we lost one-third of our people,” Netanyahu said, adding that a strong state of Israel with a powerful army was the only guarantee of preventing a second Holocaust.”
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Videos | 4 Comments
Tags: Holocaust, Holocaust Industry, Israel Charny, Norman Finkelstein
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Videos | 1 Comment
Tags: Gaza, Norman Finkelstein, Operation Cast Lead
The anchor in the video – the one repeatedly dismissing an elected Israeli-Palestinian MK as “impudent” for daring to protest the murder of Palestinian children – is Dan Margalit, among other things a former reporter for Ha’aretz and former editor of Ma’ariv. He rejected the Goldstone report into the Gaza massacre as “classic anti-Semitism“, dismissing Judge Richard Goldstone as “an obsequious Jew … [dancing] to the tune of the Gentile landowner”. He is, in other words, a repellent apologist for war crimes. But the confrontation shown above reveals more than that. As Prof. Yehuda Shenhav writes,
“This drama reveals the sting of the conflict and which demonstrates how the gap between liberalism and racism is hair thin. At the moment of truth, the liberal Israeli becomes domineering and racist. This is a glaring product of the nationalistic model called a “Jewish and Democratic state” and one that keeps the skeleton of 1948 hidden in closet.”
The same colonial mentality is evident in this Ynet piece by Assaf Wohl, who dismisses MK Zahalka as having “got carried away with stories”. But Wohl is not just attacking Zahalka specifically – rather, he locates the problem in a more general Arab tendency to deceit:
“[l]ies, manipulations, and deception are fundamental pillars in Arab dialectic”.
After generously granting Palestinian citizens of Israel permission to continue living there, Wohl rams his point home, reminding them that their presence in Israel and indeed their very existence is entirely at his discretion:
“you are no more than a little dot in continuous Hebrew history in Eretz Yisrael”.
Returning now to Prof. Shenhav:
“The meeting between MK Zahalka and Margalit is a metaphor of the moral crisis in which Zionism is found today. Zahalka dared in his “impudence” to point out the skeleton in the closet, the same one that Margalit is trying to hide. As in totalitarian regimes, Margalit wants to aid the regime in hiding the secret and employs symbolic violence. Margalit’s position is dangerous to the future of the Jews because it seeks to ensure the rights and security through the perpetual use of tanks, instead of opening the conflict up [and getting to the bottom of it].”
This all serves to reinforce the point, made forcefully by Noam Chomsky, that most of those who portray themselves as “supporters of Israel” are in fact supporters of its moral degeneration, to the point where even relatively mainstream liberals like Margalit turn into raving colonialist racists when confronted by a Palestinian who won’t just shut up and die quietly.
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Videos | 2 Comments
Tags: colonialism, Dan Margalit, MK Jamal Zahalka, Racism, zionism
More Ha’aretz racism
No, I’m not here referring merely to the execrable Bradley Burston:
Ha’aretz, the bastion of Israel’s liberal elite, has form in this regard: see, for instance, here, here and here. What does it say about the degraded state of a society’s political discourse if its most intellectual and liberal mainstream paper is able to run adverts like this confident that they won’t alienate its readership?
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Media | 8 Comments
Tags: 'demographic balance', Ha'aretz, Racism, zionism
The betrayal of Gaza
In a report [.pdf] published this week, Amnesty International, Oxfam, Christian Aid and other leading aid agencies decried Israel’s ongoing siege of Gaza. The siege amounts, they concluded, to the illegal “collective punishment” of a civilian population, and its effect is to
“systematically … [destroy] the hopes of Gaza’s people for social and economic development and of its business sector for growth and trade; and with them … the key foundations for a just and sustainable peace”.
Next week will mark the one year anniversary of ‘Operation Cast Lead‘, the three week orgy of killing and destruction that left more than 1,400 Palestinians dead, the vast majority of them civilians, including hundreds of children.
During the massacre Gaza’s civilian infrastructure was systematically targeted. Entire residential areas were “almost completely flattened”, dozens of hospitals and clinics were severely damaged, hundreds of schools were destroyed or damaged and 700 private businesses were either partially or totally destroyed. In total a full third of all public buildings [.pdf] and perhaps 14% of all buildings [.pdf] in Gaza were affected.
Today, nearly a year later, the situation in Gaza remains desperate. The total ban on exports and the 80% reduction in imports, which are now restricted to only the most basic humanitarian and medical supplies, has taken its toll on the civilian population:
- About 10% of children under five suffer from malnutrition (WFP)
- Over 80% of Gaza residents depend on humanitarian food aid to survive (UN)
- More than 120,000 jobs have been lost in the private sector (UN), Gaza’s entire industrial zone has been either demolished or crippled by the three- year blockade
The Red Cross (h/t lenin) reports that “[t]here has been scarcely any improvement in the situation since the end of the war in Gaza, mainly because of the tight closure, which is preventing reconstruction”. Israel has prevented the import of construction materials like concrete and glass to the Strip, making rebuilding on any significant scale impossible:
“since Operation Cast Lead, only 41 truckloads of construction materials for all purposes have been permitted into Gaza. Thousands of truckloads are required to rebuild all the houses destroyed. And this is to say nothing of all the remaining reconstruction desperately needed to put right damage to all the schools, hospitals, other buildings and water network because of previous military action or serious dilapidation caused by lack of repair materials due to the blockade.” [my emph.]
This amounts to “barely four trucks of construction material a month”, or 0.05% of pre-blockade monthly flows. As a result hospitals, schools, factories, farms, homes and other essential civilian infrastructure “remain in ruins”. 20,000 people are still displaced, some of them living in tents or relying on emergency mud brick huts built by the UN. It has been estimated that if the current pace of reconstruction continues, it will take 500 years to repair the damage from ‘Cast Lead’ alone. Then there’s the power network which, already “on the verge of collapse” due to the siege, suffered “extensive, long-term damage” during the massacre. “[U]rgent repairs” have “not been allowed to proceed”, and so the population of Gaza faces a difficult winter ahead with power cuts of four to eight hours per day and “frequent … gas and water shortages, seriously affecting daily life and public health”.
Gaza’s water and sanitation infrastructure is even worse shape. Decades of neglect, the siege and repeated Israeli attacks (during ‘Cast Lead’ wells and pumps were “bombed or bulldozed on a huge scale”) have meant that only 5-10% of Gaza’s water reserves meet international safety standards for drinkable water. Thousands of people are still without running water, and despite the “desperate need” for repair work Israel won’t even permit the entry of generators to power the wells. Earlier this year local authorities and UN agencies warned of a looming water crisis – already 12% of young deaths are caused by diarrhoea, an “easily preventable disease”.
That Israel is blocking reconstruction in Gaza should come as no surprise. ‘Operation Cast Lead’, erroneously portrayed by most Western commentators – even those sympathetic to Gaza’s plight – as a response to the Qassam rockets, was part of a broader policy of “protracted collective punishment” designed to isolate and paralyse the Hamas government, undermine the ‘moderates’ within Hamas, punish the population for its defiance and, crucially, prevent economic development and reduce Gaza to aid dependency.
The destruction meted out during ‘Cast Lead’ was thus anything but random. On the contrary: an EU study [.pdf] found that 84% of the structural damage was “inflicted on three key sectors: housing, agriculture and the private sector”. As the UN World Food Program reports, ”it was precisely the strategic economic areas that Gaza depends on to relieve its dependency on aid that were wiped out.” The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights similarly concluded that Israel’s systematic destruction of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure was designed “to make Gaza go decades back“.
The destruction of Gaza’s agricultural industry, which used to employ 13% of Gaza’s workforce, is a case in point. In the course of ‘Cast Lead’ crops, livestock and agricultural infrastructure were extensively targeted. Taking into account both the direct damage caused by Israeli tanks and missiles and Israel’s subsequent unilateral extension of the ‘buffer-zone’ along the border, which put between a third and a quarter of Gaza’s agricultural beyond the reach of Palestinian farmers, “an estimated 46% of agricultural land has been put out of production”. The UN inquiry [.pdf] into the massacre chaired by Prof. Richard Goldstone concluded that
“in the destruction by Israeli armed forces of private residential houses, water wells, water tanks, agricultural land and greenhouses there was a specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance to the population of the Gaza Strip.”
In short, the strategic objectives that led Israel to force the closure of 98% of industrial operations in Gaza before ‘Cast Lead’ were the same strategic objectives that led Israel to bomb hundreds of factories during the massacre. The objectives that led Israel to bomb Gaza’s only power station back in 2006 were the same objectives that led Israel to extensively target Gaza’s power infrastructure during ‘Cast Lead’ and prevent its reconstruction afterwards. The objectives that led Israel to destroy 20 of Gaza’s 29 ready mix concrete plans, including its only cement packaging and storage plant, during ‘Cast Lead’ are the same objectives motivating its refusal to permit concrete and other building materials to be imported into Gaza now. The siege and the periodic military assaults on Gaza are part of the same overarching, long-term policy to impoverish and isolate Gaza, undermine Hamas and permanently eliminate any potential for economic development – what Harvard specialist Sara Roy has termed “de-development” [.pdf]* or, as one Israeli officer described his mission, “no development, no prosperity, only humanitarian dependency” [.pdf].
International complicity
The aid agencies’ report accuses world powers of having “betrayed” the population of Gaza by failing to genuinely challenge Israel’s siege:
“They have wrung hands and issued statements, but have taken little meaningful action to attempt to change the damaging policy that prevents reconstruction, personal recovery and economic recuperation.”
Despite its “continuing and devastating” humanitarian impact – which, the report emphasises, is no accident but “a matter of policy” – the siege has effectively been “accepted” by the international community, which has failed to back up its words with meaningful action and has generally sought “little more than small concessions” from Israel.
The report focuses in particular on the EU, which as Israel’s largest export market could apply real pressure on Israel to end the closure (the US’s leverage over Israel is, of course, even greater). While the EU has taken some positive steps – notably the strong criticism levelled against both the occupation and the siege by new EU foreign minister Catherine Ashton – it has, as a result of pressure from some member states (Britain undoubtedly one of them), failed to brand the siege “collective punishment” or even a violation of international law. Despite the freeze on a formal upgrade of EU-Israel relations instituted consequent to the Gaza massacre, the EU “continues to extend new economic and trade privileges to Israel”, most recently in the form of a November agreement to liberalise agricultural trade. Indeed, as David Cronin reports, the much-hyped tension between the EU and Israel has been largely “superficial“:
“While there may have been the occasional angry word exchanged on the diplomatic front, the EU’s political and economic ties with Israel have been strengthened over the past few years to such an extent that Javier Solana, who stepped down as the Union’s foreign policy chief in late November, has remarked that Israel is an EU member state in all but name.
[...]
Israel’s effective integration into the EU has coincided with a marked reluctance on the part of the Union to denounce acts of aggression against the Palestinians. Although some individual EU representatives have described the blockade of Gaza as an act of “collective punishment” against 1.5 million civilians, no statement criticising the blockade as contrary to international humanitarian law has been issued by the 27-member bloc in its entirety.
Furthermore, all of the EU’s most populous countries – Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Spain and Poland – either opposed the Goldstone report or abstained when it was considered by the UN’s General Assembly in November. (In that report, the retired South African judge Richard Goldstone and his fellow investigators found there was no justifiable military objective behind almost every attack on Gaza’s civilians undertaken by Israel in late 2008 and the beginning of this year).”
When challenged on what they’re doing to end the siege, government officials typically point to the large amount of aid (over $4bn in total) pledged to help reconstruct Gaza. In fact, as the aid agencies’ report notes, the aid has largely failed to materialise, far less made any substantive difference on the ground, because of the Israeli blockade. As the EU report linked above (sigh [.pdf]) notes, “access is a precondition for any recovery activity in the Gaza Strip”. The big danger of humanitarian reports like this is that they can inadvertantly encourage a focus on Gaza as a purely humanitarian problem, stripped of its fundamentally political causes. Indeed, as Prof. Avi Shlaim has observed, one of Israel’s aims in Gaza is precisely to “ensure that the Palestinians in Gaza are seen by the world simply as a humanitarian problem and thus to derail their struggle for independence and statehood”. The World Bank [.pdf] has been consistent in warning against this “illusion that economic prosperity can be de-coupled from a political horizon”, adding that
“real reconstruction of Gaza – one including some revival of the moribund private sector — entails not only the opening of the crossings for building materials and cash, but also enabling external trade so that the revitalized private sector can continue to mend and flourish”.
What we can do
In the face of this refusal by governments to adhere to and enforce international law, it falls to us as citizens of those governments to act. This means organising to pressure our representatives to end state support for Israeli crimes. More concretely, the Gaza Freedom March is planned for December 31 and it needs our support. Some 1,300 activists from around the world will converge on Gaza and then march alongside tens of thousands of Palestinians towards the Erez border crossing in an attempt to nonviolently break the siege. As I’ve previously written, if it is successful this effort has the potential to be a real game-changer, in terms of both ending the closure and establishing a powerful precedent for the successful use of mass nonviolent resistance to oppose Israel’s occupation.
Unfortunately the Egyptian government, which is itself heavily complicit in the siege, has declared that it will not allow the international activists to enter Gaza through Rafah. The march’s organisers are confident that if enough people send emails and make calls to their nearest Egyptian embassy demanding that Egypt let the marchers through then the demonstration will be permitted to proceed – so get on it.
More generally Israel is suffering badly from what Netanyahu calls the “Goldstone threat“, namely the PR catastrophe that resulted from the brutality of ‘Cast Lead’ and the Goldstone inquiry’s subsequent condemnation of Israel’s actions as ‘war crimes’. As an Israeli journalist known for his establishment connections recently wrote in Ma’ariv,
“Israel’s diplomatic status is undergoing a rapid collapse, whose like we have never known before. We did undergo crises during the first Lebanon War, the First Intifada and on other occasions – but never did we fall from a such great height to such a low depth, and the bottom is still far down.”
With the relentless colonisation of the West Bank continuing apace and nonviolent Palestinian activists facing an increasingly brutal campaign of repression by the Israeli military, now is no time to ease up the pressure.
______
* A UN report leaked in September described “a process of de-development in the Gaza Strip, which potentially could lead to the complete breakdown of public infrastructure and further deterioration in the economy.” As far back as 2007 the World Bank warned of potentially “irreversible” economic collapse in Gaza.
Filed under: European Union, Israeli / Palestinian | 11 Comments
Tags: collective punishment, EU, Gaza, Gaza Freedom March, Gaza massacre, humanitarian, nonviolence, Operation Cast Lead, siege
Filed under: Israeli / Palestinian, Videos | Leave a Comment
Tags: Cast Lead, Gaza, siege, war crimes
-
Subscribe to The Heathlander feed
-
Site Meter
Recent Entries
- Charlie Brooker on media coverage of Haiti
- Getting Voltaire wrong
- Don’t mean no trouble…
- Introducing… the New Left Project
- Norman Finkelstein on the political abuse of the Holocaust
- Norman Finkelstein: Q & A on Gaza
- The racist arrogance of Israeli hacks
- More Ha’aretz racism
- The betrayal of Gaza
- Long Live Gaza: Remembering one year since the massacre
- Budrus
Categories
- Activism (42)
- Cool Stuff (13)
- European Union (20)
- Interviews (6)
- Iran (40)
- Iraq (46)
- Israeli / Palestinian (292)
- Latin America (9)
- Lebanon (16)
- Media (62)
- meta (4)
- News and politics (241)
- Quote of the Day (21)
- Torture (19)
- UK (106)
- Uncategorized (1)
- US (152)
- Venezuela (9)
- Videos (80)
- West Papua (8)
- WMD (20)
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
